Blog
Government pushes ahead with plans to raise state pension age for women
The UK coalition government has won a vote in the House of Commons to take forward plans to raise the state pension age for women. 500,000 women will now have to wait 18 months to two years longer than they expected before they can collect their state pension, costing them up to £15,000 each.
The equalisation of the state pension between men and women will now be accelerated with women’s retirement age rising from 60 to 65 in 2018, two years earlier than previous plans. The retirement age will then rise to 66 for both men and women in 2020.
Many of the women affected, who are currently in their mid to late 50s, are already seriously disadvantaged when it comes to pensions, especially those who work part-time. Most of the women will have earned less over their lifetime, have less savings, and less of a pension than men of the equivalent age. Many of the women will also have had interrupted careers due to taking time out to care for children, which means they will have vast holes in their pension pots. Many will also not have had access to company pension schemes. On top of this, these women have now been given very little notice to make alternative plans for their retirement.
More than 170 MPs have now signed a Commons motion calling for a rethink over the plans, including both Conservative and Liberal Democrat backbenchers.
Close the Gap newsround (7)
Missed our tweets or Facebook updates? Catch up with the latest events, news, consultations and research.
EVENTS
Wednesday 8th June, Engender Office, 5.30 – 7pm
Is it time for Quotas?
After this month’s Scottish Parliamentary elections, we now have 45 women MSP’s out of 129, that’s 34.8%. Though the number is up from 43 (33.3%), after the 2007 election, the trend behind the numbers – with more women being elected from regional lists than constituency votes for the first time – points to a gradual decline.
Roadshows to engage with women across Scotland. Various dates and places throughout June.
NEWS
Gender equality-it's just good economic sense
The Corporate Gender Gap Report: how is the UK performing?
Schools failing to help girls escape career stereotypes, says Ofsted
Female engineer heads up Engineering Council
It's true – there are too few women presenting science on TV
Women at the Top: employers urged to create a robust 'pipeline' for women's progression
In Switzerland women earn 41% less than men
The cost of failing to address equal pay in local governement
Christine Largarde, French Finance Minister announces candidacy for top post at IMF
Michelle Bachelet in address to UK Parliament says gender eqaulity means improved GNP
In Australia women would need to work an extra 63 days to close the pay gap
Concern over the impact of the UK Government's policies on women
Ireland proposing to remove funding from parties unless gender quota is reached
Quotas and women-only shortlists aren't popular, but they work
CONSULTATIONS
UK Government, deadline 10 June: Women's Engagement: Strengthening women's voices in Government.
European Commission, deadline 15 June: Public consultation on the future funding activities in the area of Justice, Fundamental Rights and Equalities
RESEARCH
Research conducted with German companies on felxible working times reveals the tensions between imposed flexible time, employee autonomy and productivity. Full research reference:
Kattenbach R., Demerouti E., & Nachreiner F., (2010) 'Flexible working times: effects on employees' exhaustion, work-nonwork conflict and job performance', Career Development International, Vol.15, No. 3, pp 279-295.
Opportunity Now Benchmarking Trend Analysis 2010-2011
Clarification from Equalities Minister on the aims of the Red Tape Challenge
Lynne Featherstone, Minister for Equalities has recently released a statement to reassure stakeholders that the inclusion of the Equality Act 2010 on the Red Tape Challenge website does not mean that the Government wishes to abolish it.
Here is what the statement says:
'...However, the presence of the Equality Act 2010 on the Red Tape Challenge website has raised some concern amongst some stakeholders. I’m therefore writing to clarify the Government’s position.
Firstly, I would like to assure you of this Government’s strong commitment to equality. We are not changing direction on this. We set out our commitment in the Coalition Programme and Theresa May, the Home Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities, set out the Government’s approach in more detail in the Equality Strategy published last December.
Secondly, as the website now makes clear, a particular regulation being featured on the Red Tape Challenge website should not be read as implying any intention on the part of the Government to remove that regulation.
Indeed, the Home Secretary stated in Parliament on 5 May, in reference to the Equality Act’s inclusion on the Red Tape Challenge website, that "it is not the Government’s intention to abolish the Equality Act.’
Instead, the Government wants to hear from members of the public, businesses and voluntary and community organisations about how the Act is working in practice. We want to know whether the Act could be simplified, better implemented, or if certain provisions should be dropped or amended, or whether it should be kept exactly as it is.
From June 9 until June 30, the Red Tape Challenge will have a spotlight on the Equalities theme, which will be facilitated by Caroline Waters, Head of HR, at BT. During this period, I would like to invite you to visit www.redtapechallenge.cabinetoffice.gov.uk and participate in an informed debate on how we can deliver better regulation.
Any proposals for change would receive careful consideration as to whether they were proportionate, practical, beneficial and in keeping with our wider commitments and EU or domestic legal obligations. Any proposals that passed that test would need to go through the appropriate consultation and Parliamentary process.
I hope this helps to reassure you and clarifies what we are aiming to do. We welcome your input to the Red Tape Challenge website and all relevant consultations.'
Protect equalities and take the Red Tape Challenge
As discussed in a prior blog post, the aim of the Red Tape Challenge website is to seek your views on the ways in which to, primarily, rid business of the burden of regulations and the bureaucracy associated with them.
Many comments on the website have expressed deep concern over the inclusion of the Equality Act, as it represents decades of fighting for social justice and fighting for protections from discrimination in the workplace.
9 June 2011: spotlight on equalities
Every few weeks the Government publishes all the regulations associated with a particular sector on the Red Tape Challenge website. The Red Tape Challenge will be turning the spotlight on equalities regulations on the 9 June 2011 for approximately three weeks.
During this time there will be an external facilitator from the Government to stimulate debate and facilitate more specific questions in relation to the Equality Act (as well as existing questions which include, ‘should they be scrapped altogether?’).
The appointed facilitator might organise other events to stimulate debate or indeed target the business press, so there may be opportunities to comment or participate in this consultation elsewhere.
It will be very important for individuals and organisations to post on the site during this time, even if you have already done so. The equalities section should appear on the front page from 9 June, but in the interim you can access existing comments on equalities under the General Regulations.
The last thing we want to do is give the Government a mandate to dilute or take steps to reverse equalities legislation, which is the hallmark of a progressive society. So please post a response.
Beat the Red Tape Challenge
The UK Government are asking businesses, organisations and the public to take part in the Red Tape Challenge.
The Red Tape Challenge website seeks your views on ways in which to, primarily, rid business of the burden of regulations-and inspections and bureaucracy that goes with them.
This is an interesting consultation process, with its intention to ‘open up Government’ to the public and stimulate debate and discussion to find out ways ‘existing regulation can be fulfilled in the least burdensome way possible.’
The site goes on to say that ‘presence of a particular regulation or law on this website should not be read as implying any intention on the part of the Government to remove that regulation or law from the statute book.’
So why ask the question ‘should they be scrapped altogether’? If enough people said yes, then as a beacon of democratic accountability that is exactly what the Government should do?
My dubiety is strengthened by the inclusion of the Equality Act 2010, a piece of legislation which sticks in the throat of a Government who firmly believe in meritocracy.
So far there have been 5043 individual responses to ‘equalities regulations’, many of whom are aghast at the thought of losing some hard fought for equalities legislation.
Without the Equality Act it would be lawful to pay a woman less money for the same work, sack a woman after she marries and sack a woman for being pregnant. The list could go on.
So I would urge you to take the Red Tape Challenge, if only to ensure this Government does not manage to get a mandate to reverse the equalities legislation, the cornerstone of a progressive society.
RSS